Monday, March 3, 2014

Artist's Statement: Textual Poaching

Sir. Fränkensteen

            Frankenstein: the big clunky growling monster oaf right? Wrong.  Frankenstein is one of the most misconstrued literary works of all time.  Just the name “Frankenstein” rears images of a green-skinned, bolt-necked, clunking monster.  What most people don’t know is that not only is Frankenstein the doctor who created the monster, but that the monster himself is actually as eloquent as an English professor, caring and sensitive in heart, and as fast and agile as Spider-Man.
            Merry Shelley’s original science-fiction vision was of a doctor who set out to create a physically and mentally advanced man: and succeeded.  The poor monster is ridiculed by his own creator and wanders from village to village, seeking friendship from anyone who will not judge him by his grotesque appearance.  Modern comparisons would be such of Disney’s rendition of Quasimodo from the Hunchback of Notre Dame. 
            The original Frankenstein monster has apparently been cursed throughout time in the eyes of the public.  For reasons unknown, it appears that an accurate depiction of the monster was never created in film. Ironically enough, Mel Brooks’ Young Frankenstein and Stuart Beattie’s I, Frankenstein actually came the closest to pinpointing the original character…and of course even those are extreme stretches.
            HISHE Studios have produced a line of artwork in like-mind set as my Sir. Frankesteen piece. HISHE (How It Should Have Ended) make art by taking popular films and videogames, and making parodies of them based on what may have happened if the audience had not surrendered their disbelief to the story.  The clips provoke the question: “yeah, why didn’t we think of that? That movie makes no sense now.”   A prime example is demonstrated in HISHE’s adaptation of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. In the adaptation, the Fellowship simply fly eagles to Mordor and drop the One Ring in Mount Doom as they’re flying over it.  The parody ends with the dialogue:
            “Wow, this was a great idea! Imagine if we’d walked the whole way.”
            “Yeah, one of us might have died.”
All Lord of the Rings deep doctrine aside, HISHE has managed to provoke in the common audience a question that surrenders our surrender of disbelief; it calls on our flaws as consumers to question and call out the authenticity of the film. Why didn’t they ride the eagles? Tolkien explains this: Peter Jackson did not.

            The monocle and top hat were photo-shopped onto the famous lithograph of doctor Frankenstein’s monster, in attempts to pay sympathetic homage to his intellectual roots and philosophical heart: forever misrepresented to the public since the original film adaptation in 1931.  The snarky style of art was inspired by our discussions of Duchamp’s L.H.O.O.Q. Hopefully people will question this humorous image of mine and be led to an enlightenment of the true origin of the character. Being my all time favorite novel, if ever given the opportunity to make film adaptations, Merry Shelly’s Frankenstein: the Modern Day Prometheus would be at the very top of my list.

No comments:

Post a Comment